Australasia's journal of the new media revolution

Illegal downloads more profitable

12 October 2009 Print this article Comments Share this article
According to a presentation by German anti-pirate outfit DigitRights Solutions, copyright holders can earn substantially more money from illicit downloads than from legal means (PowerPoint in German).

The report, which was translated from German by TorrentFreak, noted that sending out direct requests for damages to alleged pirates, with copyright holders generating approximately $140 per illegal download, compared to approximately $1 per legal purchase online.

Whilst aggressive copyright protection may be creating large windfalls for rights holders in Europe, Australian internet users are are somewhat shielded from this kind of action. Most leading leading ISP's refuse to dentify individual copyright infringers.

iiNet is currently in the midst of ladmark court proceedings as they defending an ISP's right to keep the identity of alleged copyright infringers private. If iiNet loses the court case it will open the gates for copyright holders to send out individual infringement notices.

Some ISP's such as Exetel have already agreed to identify individuals and send out copyright notices to their users.

Copyright concerns continues to be front of mind for many major content producers, especially in developing digital economies such as China. 

Whilst urging China to open their 'digital door'  at the World Media Conference News Corporation chief executive Rupert Murdoch has warned of the dangers of piracy:

"Chinese media and entertainment companies have a remarkable opportunity to expand their international influence and revenues." Said Mr Murdoch "Piracy will make it difficult for them to generate the profits at home that would fuel growth abroad".

Mr Murdoch also continued his vitriolic criticism of aggregators and bloggers.

"The Philistine phase of the digital age is almost over. The aggregators and the plagiarists will soon have to pay a price for the co-opting of our content," he said. "But if we do not take advantage of the current movement toward paid-for content, it will be the content creators, the people in this hall, who will pay the ultimate price and the content kleptomaniacs will triumph."

Tags: copyright | Rupert Murdoch

Related articles:


Add a comment2 Comments

  1. at 01:29 AM on 4 November 2009, BruceMcF wrote:
    When I data-mined a bootleg stream aggregator, I found that their number one free stream host is MySpaceCDN, registered to 20th Century Fox. And collecting all links to all series competing directly against licensed streams at Hulu.com, Crunchyroll.com and AnimeNewsNetwork.com, it was not a near thing, either - over 500 streams hosted at MySpaceCDN or MySpace, with the next runner up standing at 100. Rupert Murdoch going on about piracy is rich, when his MySpace servers are a leading Pirate Support Base in the US anime market.
  2. at 01:25 PM on 12 October 2009, Baggyone wrote:
    You are incorrect in your assertion that the case is about "identifying" pirates. IiNet are being taken to court for not taking "reasonable steps" to prevent piracy - in so far as they did not pass on notifications from AFACT or act upon them. Iinet contend (and the current law in Australia seems to imply) that they cannot take action upon an allegation, but need a crime proved in a court. Iinet passed the allegations on to the police, who it seems were too busy chasing real cybercriminals to follow them up. AFACT (the film/TV studios)are "fishing" for a precedent that they hope will open the doors for class actions the world over. If they succeed all ISPs will have to radically change their monitoring of all internet traffic for piracy. The cost to the industry and the internet in general will be huge and will cripple the "new media"....sounds like a good strategy for the renewed dominance of "old media."

Add a new comment

Enter the code shown:

Recent tweets

 

Recent comments

Most viewed articles this week