
Whilst engaging in social media is a great way for businesses to get
feedback and to provide customer service, it's important to keep an eye
on how things lest the trolls run rampant on your online properties.
Whilst iiNet has been busy fighting off its lawsuit against copyright agency AFACT they may have forgotten that they actually have a social media presence. There has been no updates to their
Facebook page since Christmas eve, with their Twitter page silent since the 30th December.
The radio silence also happens to coincide with iiNet
making a significant change to it's off peak quota times, reducing the
hours from 2am-12pm to 2am-8am. Whilst some quotas were readjusted to
compensate. Reactions were mixed and some customers expressed
themselves oniiNet's Facebook Page wall including:
"Naked 6 plan customers have been ROBBED because of the change in off peak hours! Shame on you IINET, its' tarished your otherwise good record with me"There
were also a number customer service complaints from as far back as
early December which have not even been acknowledged by the company.
For
a company that often prides itself on customer service, you would
expect a speedier response than this. In October CEO Michael Malone
said:
"Delivering awesome customer service is a living, breathing value that all of us at iiNet
are measured on and aspire to achieve, and this doesn’t just apply to
staff taking customer’s calls – everyone in the business has to work
together to get the best possible experience for every customer.”
It appears that whoever is in charge of their social media presence hadn't caught the memo.
To
be fair there are also lot of positive comments on the Facebook wall,
with some fans attempting to defend the company. However but it is
surprising to see no response from iiNet to the negative, inflammatory and often rude comments. It's not the best look for an official Facebook presence.
If anything it is a timely reminder that engaging in social media requires regular attention.
iiNet had not responded to inquires at the time of posting, hat tip to
@markpollard for pointing this one out.